
When reading Brave New World I thought it would be very similar to The Giver. The typical utopia turned dystopia. When I began reading I realized complex character relations and internal conflict that the characters faced. John, the only character and person in the World State that has a mother, uses Shakespeare to help him deal with his emotions. John symbolizes the closest thing to a modern human in the novel.
I think Aldous Huxley did a phenomenal job at tackling problems that will most likely be around for a long time: addiction to drugs, dependence on technology, and the absence of emotion. These things that people dealt with when the book was written in 1932 are still being dealt with today. People are still addicted to drugs, we still look to technology for the next answer, and we all somehow deal with the difficulty of emotion. I believe that when Aldous sat down to write his novel, he took the pain of his childhood, and knew that it would be carried with him till he died. Aldous was a pessimist and wanted to point out what baggage we will be carrying with us for the next 100+ years. It’s been almost 90 years since his publishment, and ironically, guess what? Every single one of the problems he wrote about is still relevant. Even with absolute power, we see communist countries struggle to survive on their own and try to recover. We see foreign relations fall through because we must ask ourselves, does equality really exist? Will all countries truly recognize each other as a good country. Will we all start seeing different looking human beings as equal?
We can all hope for equality, but what Huxley might have hinted to in Brave New World is that there will always be an obstacle for normalcy.




